Mainly copy that’s relevant, focused on the donor ,and non-institutional. Our experience is that it needs to be something related to heart or cancer and perhaps technology that does something better, keeps you out of the hospital and/or is less costly and less invasive. For children’s hospitals and hospices, patient stories usually work best, but appeals for new technology, equipment or programs can also work well.

We use both depending on the situation. A closed face envelope is a little more expensive. However, the #10 window envelope has been a workhorse for us for many decades. For hospital grateful patients, we think it may work because it approximates the look of a hospital bill. You can split test window vs. closed face, and sometimes you’ll find that a window does better, and sometimes a closed face works better. A closed face envelope has a more professionally looking business correspondence feel to it.

We usually come down on the side of not using teasers. The reason -  if you put something on the envelope that gives the recipient an idea of what's inside, and they're not interested – like if they can tell it's a fundraising letter - then the trash can is always nearby. The problem with teasers is that most people who write teasers do not know how to tease properly. A teaser has to have some mystery to it. So, when you see it, you say, “What's this  all about?”   Having no teaser is its own mystery because you're wondering “why are these people writing me?” Then you want to find out and you open the envelope. We’ve used teasers in the past and tested them. Sometimes they work, and sometimes they don't. More often than not, they don't work. So, unless you've got a superb teaser, you may want to not use one at all.  

Most of our hospital clients solicit former patients, and they mostly work well. But if you’re a hospice, you have few numbers of bereaved individuals to solicit. By the same token, if you’re a children’s hospital, you have a minimum number of patients to contact. Parents of children’s hospital patients (the guarantors) are too young to be good philanthropic prospects. As a result, what we've found is that rented lists of donors to healthcare causes in your area often work better than patients. With hospices and children’s homes, you almost have no choice but to use rented names to build your donor base. Perhaps surprisingly, rented names tend to outperform hospital grateful patients. But why would a person who hasn't been in your hospital perform better than someone who has?   With patients, we really only know two things about them. We know they're the correct age because we can select them based on age or date of birth from the patient record. We also know they've been in the hospital. But that’s it. We don't know anything else about them. But with a rented name, we know they're the right age because they've given to other nonprofit organizations. They’re definitely philanthropic. They’ve also given through the mail and are responsive to mail appeals. We also know they like to give, and particularly to healthcare causes. So that gives them an edge on former patients.